Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn judges. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn judges. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 15 tháng 5, 2013

Egyptian judges suspend talks with president

CAIRO (AP) — In their latest face-off with Egypt's Islamist rulers, the country's top council of judges decided Wednesday to suspend its participation in a government-backed judicial reform conference following a renewed push by lawmakers on a controversial bill that would force thousands of their colleagues into retirement.

The Supreme Judicial Council said in statement published by the state news agency MENA that it was backing out of the "Justice Conference" expected for later this month. It had been sponsored by Egypt's Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, and judges were supposed to come up with a plan to remake their institution.

The conference was seen as an overture to the judges by Morsi, who has clashed frequently with the judiciary since becoming president last summer. Morsi's allies say Egypt's judiciary is filled with supporters of ousted president Hosni Mubarak, who have worked to undermine the transition to democracy and the Islamists' rise to power. Judges say Morsi has tried to interfere in their affairs and curb their independence, with an eye to control them.

The crisis over the judiciary is the latest of many challenges facing Morsi, who faces a weakened economy and opposition from a wide range of mostly secular-leaning groups. Morsi's backers say the opposition is stirring up unrest to undermine his rule, while his opponents say Morsi, who was elected with 51 percent of the vote, has failed to live up to his promises of being inclusive and ignored the goals of the uprising against the longtime autocratic ruler Hosni Mubarak.

Many judges already had reservations about the conference, citing mistrust between them and the president and his Islamist allies.

The new bill, proposed by Islamist lawmakers last month, has sparked uproar. One of its most controversial clauses drops the retirement age for judges from 70 to 60. This would affect nearly a quarter of the country's 13,000 judges and prosecution officials, most of them in senior positions, including in Egypt's Supreme Constitutional Court.

The Council said in its brief statement that the decision followed moves by Morsi's Islamist allies to resume debating the law, which "contradicts the requirement of convening the conference." The council said it had consulted with the country's top courts and judges before taking the decision in an emergency meeting. There was no immediate comment from the President's office.

The council's six judges met Morsi last month, and the two sides agreed to form a committee of legal experts that would draft legislation to reform the judiciary. Morsi said in a statement that he will personally adopt all the conclusions of the conference for proposals of bills in order to submit them to the legislative council.

The Egyptian judiciary has become a significant battleground between Islamists and the largely secular opposition. It is the sole branch of government not dominated by Morsi's Islamist allies, although he does have some backers among the judges. A protest by opponents and supporters of the bill turned into violent street clashes in April.

The judiciary has dealt Islamists several political setbacks. Courts dissolved the Islamist-majority lower house of parliament last year, saying the law governing its election was invalid.

This year, a court forced a delay in elections for a new parliament when it ruled that the election law had to be reviewed by the Supreme Constitutional Court. That court is due to issue a verdict next month in a case challenging the constitutionality of the current legislature, the Shura Council, which was mandated to issue law until a new parliament is elected and is discussing the judiciary law.

Senior judge Ashraf Nada, who presides over Cairo's Appeal court, said the new drive to push the law into discussion in the Shura Council was a tactic to pressure the SCC ahead of the decision on the body's constitutionality next month.

"The return of the law to the Shura Council despite a promise from Morsi that it won't be discussed until the Justice Conference is convened is a conspiracy," Nada said. "If Morsi couldn't hold them to their word, he shouldn't have called for the conference in the first place."

Nada warned that the law discussed in parliament threatens to "destroy" the Egyptian judiciary because it would send thousands of senior, well trained judges to retirement, without a way of replacing them.

Essam Sultan, a leading member of the Islamist al-Wasat party that introduced the proposed law, said the conference should still be convened with "representatives of the people" even if judges do not attend and then its recommendations be sent to the Shura Council.

He wrote on his Facebook page Wednesday that the judges are not above scrutiny, and that the public is looking for justice to be meted out after many years because of "huge cracks" in the justice system.

"It is a mistake for some judges to think that they alone are interested in conferences and draft bills that relate to matters of justice, and that the people don't exist," Sultan wrote. "The solution is with the people."

Judges say the lawmakers are violating the country's new constitution, which requires that the judiciary be consulted on any laws pertaining to their profession before taking it to the legislature. In an emergency session last month, the powerful Judges Club, the main organization representing Egypt's 13,000 judges, said the law is trampling on their rights and vowed to complain to international organizations against violations against the judiciary.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 8 tháng 5, 2013

Bangladesh braces for unrest as judges prepare war crime verdict

By Serajul Quadir

DHAKA (Reuters) - A Bangladeshi war crimes tribunal is due to pronounce judgment on a top Islamist politician on Thursday, raising fears a guilty verdict could ignite a fresh round of clashes between members of his party and security forces.

Bangladesh, reeling from a factory collapse that killed more than 700 people two weeks ago, is navigating one of its most turbulent periods since independence as a series of political conflicts converge ahead of elections due early next year.

Protests over the war crimes trials are one of the main challenges facing the government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who opened an inquiry into abuses committed during a 1971 war for independence from Pakistan in 2010.

The tribunals have angered Islamists who say they are a politically-motivated attempt to persecute the leadership of Jamaat-e-Islami, the main Islamist party in Bangladesh and a key part of an opposition coalition.

Bangladesh became part of Pakistan at the end of British colonial rule in 1947. The independence war claimed about 3 million lives. Thousands of women were raped.

Some factions in Bangladesh opposed the break with Pakistan, including Jamaat. Its leaders have denied involvement in abuses.

On Thursday, judges are due to hand down a verdict in the trial of Muhammad Kamaruzzaman, a leader of Jamaat who is accused of involvement in the murder and torture of several civilians.

Syed Haider Ali, the lead government prosecutor, said he expected the court would sentence Kamaruzzaman to death.

"On the basis of our arguments we are hopeful of getting the highest punishment," Ali told reporters.

Kamaruzzaman was arrested in a separate criminal case in July, 2010, and was charged with war crimes the following month. He has pleaded not guilty through his lawyers.

Dozens of people have been killed in clashes between security forces and protesters opposed to the tribunal since the first guilty verdict was delivered in January. Kamaruzzaman's judgment will be the fourth since the trials began.

The tribunal has been criticized by rights groups for failing to adhere to international standards. Human Rights Watch said lawyers, witnesses and investigators reported they had been threatened.

In a separate challenge to Hasina's government, tens of thousands of members of the hardline Islamist Hefajat-e-Islam movement massed in the capital Dhaka this week to demand the imposition of a new blasphemy law.

At least 20 people were killed in some of the worst violence seen in the city in decades when police used water cannons to disperse the gathering.

The Bangladesh Nationalist Party, the main opposition party, has also turned up the heat on Hasina's secular Awami League government by calling a series of strikes to demand she resign.

Bangladesh has been rocked by protests and counter-protests linked to the tribunal since January, when it handed down its first sentence by condemning an expelled Jamaat member to death. In the second case, a Jamaat leader was given life in jail.

About 60 people have been killed in protests since the tribunal's third conviction in March, when another member of Jamaat, Delwar Hossain Sayedee, 73, was sentenced to death for abuses including murder and rape during the war.

Jamaat and the BNP both accuse the prime minister of using the tribunal to persecute them. The government denies that and says justice must be served.

(Editing by Matthew Green and Andrew Heavens)


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 28 tháng 4, 2013

Egypt president, judges compromising on reform law

CAIRO (AP) — The Egyptian president's office is indicating a compromise has been reached with the judiciary to defuse an uproar over a proposed law that would have forced out thousands of the country's most senior judges.

President Mohammed Morsi met Sunday with five top judges after more than a week of bitter arguing between Islamists and some in the judiciary over the disputed bill, which would lower the retirement age.

The president's allies say the courts are filled with loyalists of the deposed regime of Hosni Mubarak. The opposition accuses Morsi's backers of calling for reform of the judiciary as a cover to install their own supporters.

After the meeting, a statement from the president's office said Morsi is launching a conference to include judges in any laws about the justice system.


View the original article here